{"id":2396,"date":"2011-07-16T08:34:59","date_gmt":"2011-07-16T12:34:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/?p=2396"},"modified":"2011-07-16T08:34:59","modified_gmt":"2011-07-16T12:34:59","slug":"wot-can-we-say-see-we-told-you-so","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wot-can-we-say-see-we-told-you-so\/","title":{"rendered":"WOT can we say? See? We told you so!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We  received the following comment from Terri on our Information Avenue site this  week. We found it interesting &#8211; and we think you will too.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;One of our websites was hit on June 12, 2011, by one of the \u201cPlatinum\u201d  users using the \u201cMass Rating Tool\u201d. If you look at all of his \u201cPosts\u201d, about a  hundred have the same comment and rating, yes that\u2019s the so called beauty of  \u201cThe Tool\u201d it allows them to \u201cSpam\u201d someone\u2019s good name. I\u2019m not surprised our  site got \u201cfound\u201d, my husband makes WordPress Themes and his link is in all of  his themes, so yes our website name is associated with about\u2026well according to  Google\u2026917,000 listings.<\/p>\n<p>Anyhow, this \u201cNo Scams\u201d person at \u201cMyWoT\u201d listed  us as \u201cBlog\/Splog type link site to counterfeit websites, most likely from  China. Beside bad shopping experience you risk credit card phishing.\u201d along with  about 100 other sites that day. Funny thing is, our server is in the US, we are  in Canada, even though we have the word \u201cbuy\u201d as part of our URL, we don\u2019t sell  anything. My husband makes free Themes and free Plugins for WordPress.org, as  well as helps an awful lot of people in the world. That\u2019s what really gets me is  that one of their \u201cPlatinum\u201d users can use a \u201cSpamming\u201d tool to Ruin a persons  reputation. And I\u2019m sure they will come back and say it was some anonymous  person from the net who rated us\u2026but it actually does show this persons user  name and I found the page we are on from June 12 of his history.<\/p>\n<p>Sorry I  guess I just have to rant, because I don\u2019t know the person who did this and it\u2019s  obvious they don\u2019t know us with the comment they made about our  site.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, I have emailed, I doubt that it will do any good, seeing how  it hasn\u2019t done anyone else any good.<\/p>\n<p>If anyone has any \u201cwords of wisdom\u201d  for me that would be wonderful. Thanks for reading my rant.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;re not sure if we have any words of wisdom for Terri, but we can say we  warned everyone quite a while ago that a community rating system &#8211; where those  who rate the most sites are rewarded and encouraged &#8211; would end hurting innocent  sites and cause WOT to stray from its stated mission of protecting users from  truly dangerous sites.<\/p>\n<p>The WOT (Web of Trust) rating system encourages abuse &#8211; and offers the  company protection from defamation and libel lawsuits. Instead of taking  responsibility for the ratings they give sites, they can simply say, &#8220;our  community members rated the site and we are simply basing our ratings on our  community&#8217;s input.&#8221; This shouldn&#8217;t fly in a court of law. A company like WOT  should bear the burden if it rates innocent sites as dangerous and thus drives  business or traffic away from them. If a mom and pop store provides a living for  a family &#8211; a bad rating by WOT could take away that family&#8217;s income.<\/p>\n<p>We  said a long time ago that WOT needs to verify its ratings &#8211; and not depend on a  handful of its community member armed with mass rating tools to rate sites  poorly for no other reason than they had a bad experience with the site or they  don&#8217;t agree with the site&#8217;s content. Or maybe had no experience with the site at  all. It&#8217;s bad enough that WOT doesn&#8217;t take responsibility for the ratings it  publishes, but that it rewards and encourages this mass-rating mania is  unconscionable.<\/p>\n<p>Now WOT has sold its services to Facebook, schools, and  even law enforcement. WOT is selling Safe Site Badges to sites willing to pay  for them. In short, WOT is profiting while site&#8217;s like Terri&#8217;s husband&#8217;s are  being hurt.<\/p>\n<p>WOT needs to be held responsible for ratings which are  baseless and unfounded. WOT needs to control its community and not encourage and  reward users who post tens of thousands of ratings.<\/p>\n<p>The only way to get  WOT to listen and to stop them from hurting sites that are not dangerous is for  people to stop using WOT. Most current version browsers have anti-phishing site  and fraudulent site filters. People need to stop depending on WOT to tell them  which sites are safe and which are not &#8211; because honestly WOT&#8217;s community  doesn&#8217;t seem to know. WOT should have concentrated its efforts on keeping people  off of truly dangerous sites &#8211; not sites with content they don&#8217;t agree with &#8211; or  totally innocent sites like Terri&#8217;s husband&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p>Using WOT&#8217;s toolbar will  only end up damaging the reputation of more innocent and\/or non-dangerous sites.  We frankly don&#8217;t care what WOT&#8217;s community thinks of sites with whom they don&#8217;t  agree. We think WOT should have stuck to its original mission of protecting  users from dangerous sites &#8211; but it has gotten so far from that mission that we  would never consider using WOT on our computers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We received the following comment from Terri on our Information Avenue site this week. We found it interesting &#8211; and we think you will too. &#8220;One of our websites was hit on June 12, 2011, by one of the \u201cPlatinum\u201d users using the \u201cMass Rating Tool\u201d. If you look at all of his \u201cPosts\u201d, about a hundred have\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wot-can-we-say-see-we-told-you-so\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,10],"tags":[438,1317,1318,23],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2396"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2397,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396\/revisions\/2397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}