{"id":3289,"date":"2011-12-03T06:04:48","date_gmt":"2011-12-03T11:04:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/?p=3289"},"modified":"2011-12-03T06:04:48","modified_gmt":"2011-12-03T11:04:48","slug":"our-opinion-of-ie9s-smart-screen-filter-irks-a-reader","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/our-opinion-of-ie9s-smart-screen-filter-irks-a-reader\/","title":{"rendered":"Our opinion of IE9&#8217;s Smart Screen filter irks a reader"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Rom disagrees with our opinion about Internet Explorer&#8217;s Smart  Screen<\/strong><br \/>\nI totally disagree with your comments on Widows Smart Screen. It  is a warning. that makes you ask yourself &#8220;Do I trust the source of this  program?&#8221;. The source is Information Ave and I trust them because they test the  program before they recommend it. You test a lot of little know programs and the  Smart Screen will appear with many of them. Stating that that it is nonsense is  a disservice to your readers since they may ignore the warning about a program  from another source that does not thoroughly test the programs that they  recommend.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Our answer<\/strong><br \/>\nWe&#8217;d totally agree with you if it worked,  but it doesn&#8217;t. Smart Screen will let you download SmileyCentral, for example,  without causing you to pause. Do you know why? Because big companies can afford  what are known as &#8220;security certificates&#8221;. And Windows Internet Explorer won&#8217;t  bat an eye if a download has a security certificate. Now this would be great if  only good guys could by them &#8211; or if they actually meant something. But do you  know what a certificate guarantees you? It guarantees you that the company who  claims to have made the file actually made it. It in no way guarantees you that  the file is safe.<\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t have security certificates &#8211; and many of the  freeware programs we feature are made by small companies like ours and they  don&#8217;t have them either. So does the lack of a certificate mean the file is less  safe? No. Does it mean that one with a certificate is safe? No. Microsoft&#8217;s  Smart Screen is based on the nonsense logic that if a file has no certificate  and hasn&#8217;t been downloaded much (what about a brand new program?), then the file  is subject to suspicion. Yet millions of Internet Explorer uses download adware  and spyware because Smart Screen doesn&#8217;t bat an eye because the files have  certificates.<\/p>\n<p>The worst thing about Smart Screen is it lulls users into  thinking that if Smart Screen does not give a warning then the file is safe. And  that&#8217;s simply not true. We don&#8217;t much like programs that lull users into  thinking they can rely on software to keep them safe. If you can&#8217;t rely on a  program&#8217;s accuracy, then you can&#8217;t rely on the program. If you had a  malfunctioning carbon monoxide detector in your house that was constantly  warning you of high-levels of carbon monoxide, that would make you think too.  But does that make your faulty carbon monoxide detector worth having? No. You  wouldn&#8217;t say it does either.<\/p>\n<p>Giving you pause and making you think a file might be harmful  would be OK if Smart Screen didn&#8217;t, on the other hand, allow you to download  files that can harm your computer and jeopardize your privacy. So we will stand  by our opinion of IE&#8217;s Smart Screen Filter. If Smart Screen was even 85%  accurate in its warnings we might be more inclined to give it some latitude. But  it is not accurate, it&#8217;s not even close. So we respectfully disagree with you,  Rom.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rom disagrees with our opinion about Internet Explorer&#8217;s Smart Screen I totally disagree with your comments on Widows Smart Screen. It is a warning. that makes you ask yourself &#8220;Do I trust the source of this program?&#8221;. The source is Information Ave and I trust them because they test the program before they recommend it. You test a\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/our-opinion-of-ie9s-smart-screen-filter-irks-a-reader\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1462,10],"tags":[442,103,1590],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3289"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3289"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3291,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3289\/revisions\/3291"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}