{"id":7401,"date":"2014-04-17T09:43:08","date_gmt":"2014-04-17T13:43:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/?p=7401"},"modified":"2014-04-17T09:46:26","modified_gmt":"2014-04-17T13:46:26","slug":"and-its-one-two-three-strikes-and-youre-running-windows-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/and-its-one-two-three-strikes-and-youre-running-windows-9\/","title":{"rendered":"And It&#8217;s One, Two, Three Strikes and You&#8217;re Running Windows 9?"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2><a href=\"https:\/\/www.readability.com\/articles\/b9mo6abb\">Three&#8217;s a charm? Windows 8 patches could pave multiple paths to Windows 9<\/a><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.infoworld.com\/sites\/infoworld.com\/files\/media\/image\/Microsoft_Windows_hp.jpg\" alt=\"Three's a charm? Windows 8 patches could pave multiple paths to Windows 9\" width=\"243\" \/><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Trying to piece together the puzzle created by Microsoft&#8217;s new patching policy, I was struck by an intriguing thought. If you look at the situation just right and connect the dots with a few leaps of faith, there&#8217;s a possibility we&#8217;re witnessing the birth of a &#8220;three versions&#8221; future for Windows 9 (code-named &#8220;Threshold&#8221;). That would be extraordinarily good news, albeit little consolation to those who are still <a href=\"http:\/\/www.infoworld.com\/t\/microsoft-windows\/windows-81-update-woes-pile-errors-80070020-80073712-800f081f-80242fff-800f0922-240249\">stuck trying to install Windows 8.1 Update<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft&#8217;s confirmation that it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.infoworld.com\/t\/microsoft-windows\/microsoft-confirms-its-dropping-windows-81-support-240407\">will stop issuing security patches for Windows 8.1<\/a> has turned into a lightning rod for people who are unhappy with Windows 8 in general and Windows 8 patching in particular. You need look no further than the comments to <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.technet.com\/b\/gladiatormsft\/archive\/2014\/04\/12\/information-regarding-the-latest-update-for-windows-8-1.aspx\">Steve Thomas&#8217; TechNet post<\/a> last weekend, which confirmed that Windows 8.1 customers who want new security patches have to first install Windows 8.1 Update. NSFW warning: Many of the comments about the Windows 8.1 Update requirement are not kind &#8212; or printable.<\/p>\n<p>(A note on terminology: Windows 8.1 Update &#8212; note the capital &#8220;U&#8221; &#8212; specifically refers to the patch made widely available last week as <a href=\"http:\/\/support.microsoft.com\/kb\/2919355\">KB 2919355<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>Cutting off Windows 8.1 patches is controversial. The argument goes like this: &#8220;If you want security patch C, you need to get security patch B first. In this case, security patch B just happens to be the 8.1 Update.&#8221; Fair enough&#8230;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.readability.com\/articles\/b9mo6abb\" target=\"_blank\">Read the rest of this Woody Leonhard article here.<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Three&#8217;s a charm? Windows 8 patches could pave multiple paths to Windows 9 &nbsp; Trying to piece together the puzzle created by Microsoft&#8217;s new patching policy, I was struck by an intriguing thought. If you look at the situation just right and connect the dots with a few leaps of faith, there&#8217;s a possibility we&#8217;re witnessing the birth\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/and-its-one-two-three-strikes-and-youre-running-windows-9\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7401"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7401"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7401\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7406,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7401\/revisions\/7406"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}