{"id":7506,"date":"2014-05-01T16:48:30","date_gmt":"2014-05-01T20:48:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/?p=7506"},"modified":"2014-05-01T16:49:41","modified_gmt":"2014-05-01T20:49:41","slug":"microsoft-backs-down-releases-patch-for-windows-xp-and-internet-explorer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/microsoft-backs-down-releases-patch-for-windows-xp-and-internet-explorer\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft Backs Down, Releases Patch for Windows XP and Internet Explorer"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"article_header\" class=\"clearfix\" style=\"color: #000000;\">\n<blockquote>\n<h1>Microsoft makes one-time exception, patches IE on Windows XP<\/h1>\n<h2 style=\"color: #666666;\">Calls news coverage of IE vulnerability &#8216;overblown,&#8217; but patches IE6, IE7 and IE8 on XP anyway<\/h2>\n<div>Microsoft today shipped an emergency update for Internet Explorer to close a hole that hackers had already been exploiting.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"article_body\" style=\"color: #000000;\">\n<blockquote><p>But in an unexpected move, Microsoft allowed Windows XP machines to receive the update, even though it had long held that the 13-year-old operating system had absolutely, positively retired on April 8.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m surprised they went out-of-band at all,&#8221; said Andrew Storms, director of DevOps at security company CloudPassage, using the term for an emergency update outside the normal monthly patch cycle Microsoft maintains. &#8220;While there was a lot of talk about this zero-day, it was mainly focused on the XP angle.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In fact, today&#8217;s turnabout\u00a0<i>was<\/i>\u00a0bigger news than the security update itself, something Microsoft tacitly acknowledged by posting a\u00a0<a style=\"color: #206ba4;\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.technet.com\/b\/microsoft_blog\/archive\/2014\/05\/01\/updating-internet-explorer-and-driving-security.aspx\" target=\"new\">long blog post<\/a>\u00a0that dealt not with the patch or the vulnerability, but with its decision to give XP customers a break.<\/p>\n<p>In that blog, Adrienne Hall, a general manager in Microsoft&#8217;s Trustworthy Computing group, made plain that today&#8217;s release was the exception, not the rule, going forward. &#8220;We made this exception based on the proximity to the end of support for Windows XP,&#8221; Hall wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft dropped XP from its support list three weeks ago.<\/p>\n<p>But Storms questioned whether Microsoft had, knowingly or not, set a precedent that outsiders would cite each time a new vulnerability in Windows XP appeared.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For me it begs the question: So when exactly\u00a0<i>is<\/i>\u00a0the end of life date for XP?&#8221; Storms said in an interview conducted via instant message. &#8220;What if there is another zero-day next week or next month? When is Microsoft really really<i>really<\/i>\u00a0going to put their foot down? So I&#8217;m surprised they went against their word on the end of life date. It just leaves open the door for more patches either to XP or other [outdated] platforms in the future.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Hall also seemed to blame news reports about the flaw &#8212; in particular that most reports led with the fact that XP would be vulnerable &#8212; for forcing Microsoft&#8217;s hand.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The news coverage of the last few days about a vulnerability in Internet Explorer (IE) has been tough for our customers and for us,&#8221; she said to open the blog, then later argued that the IE bug made headlines only because of its timing. &#8220;One of the things that drove much of this coverage was that it coincided with the end of support for Windows XP,&#8221; Hall asserted.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The reality is there have been a very small number of attacks based on this particular vulnerability and concerns were, frankly, overblown,&#8221; Hall added. &#8220;Unfortunately this is a sign of the times and this is not to say we don&#8217;t take these reports seriously. We absolutely do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft should not have been surprised that news spread about the IE flaw or that media reports focused on the fact that the bug was the first example of XP&#8217;s out-in-the-cold situation. Others in the company&#8217;s Trustworthy Computing group have long predicted that\u00a0<a style=\"color: #206ba4;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/s\/article\/9243660\/Windows_XP_infection_rate_may_jump_66_after_patches_end_in_April\">attacks against XP PCs would increase<\/a>\u00a0once support for the OS ended, and\u00a0<a style=\"color: #206ba4;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.computerworld.com\/s\/article\/9247207\/Microsoft_returns_to_scare_tactic_well_in_dump_XP_campaign\">used the dire forecast to push customers<\/a>\u00a0into migrating to something newer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/goo.gl\/sYle7Q\" target=\"_blank\">Source: ComputerWorld<\/a><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Microsoft makes one-time exception, patches IE on Windows XP Calls news coverage of IE vulnerability &#8216;overblown,&#8217; but patches IE6, IE7 and IE8 on XP anyway Microsoft today shipped an emergency update for Internet Explorer to close a hole that hackers had already been exploiting. But in an unexpected move, Microsoft allowed Windows XP machines to receive the update,\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/microsoft-backs-down-releases-patch-for-windows-xp-and-internet-explorer\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1426,779],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7506"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7506"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7509,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7506\/revisions\/7509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thundercloud.net\/infoave\/new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}