We can see by the reaction that many of you have to upcoming end of Windows XP, and the poor public reaction to Windows 8 and 8.1 which now if officially the worst selling Windows since Vista – that Microsoft is determined to give you what they want you to have and not what you want.
This kind of shortsightedness at Microsoft is very reminiscent of the kind of shortsightedness that prevailed in the American automobile industry at the time Nissan (then Datsun), Toyota, and Honda started selling cars in the U.S.A. The big three scoffed at those Japanese cars.
Nissan, Toyota, and Honda, were all producing superior cars that lasted longer and got better gas mileage than any of the big three’s cars. Still GM, Chrysler and Ford laughed — because the money was still rolling in. It took a while before the Japanese car companies gained a foothold in the United States, but once they did, they did so in a big way. And GM, Ford,a and Chrysler stopped laughing and tried to catch up. But they had fallen so far behind that GM and Chrysler teetered on the verge of bankruptcy; Ford was a little smarter, they saw the light and started downsizing sooner and stayed out of the government handout line.
Microsoft is still publicly laughing at Google and Apple, but behind the scenes heads must be rolling. While Microsoft slept, Apple introduced the iPod music player — Microsoft tried to catch up with its now defunct Zune music player. Then Apple released the iPhone. Microsoft counter with its Kin smartphones — does anyone even remember them? The Apple introduced the iPad — and Microsoft, again caught napping, revamped its Windows 7 operating system, into Windows 8 which it touted as a one-size-fits all operating system — tablets, phones, and PCs.
Most of us know that the one-size-fits-all approach hardly ever delivers what it promises. And in the year following the release of Windows 8 (2013) PC sales fell to their lowest level in a long time. Windows 8 makes a lot of sense for tablets and phones — and maybe even touch screen PCs. But it makes no sense to the traditional Windows mouse and keyboard user or to the hundreds of thousands of businesses who use Windows.
Microsoft keeps trying to patch up Windows 8. Windows 8.1 adds a mysterious start button which does not lead to a start menu, but to the start screen. People wanted to avoid the garish start screen, that’s why they wanted a start button AND a start menu — like ever version of Windows has had since Windows 3.1.
Here’s what I think Microsoft should do. I think they should use Windows 8 for phones, tablets and touch-screen PCs. And introduce an updated version of Windows XP. They could it Windows XPS or Windows XPN and bring back the operating system that 95% of users loved. Give current XP users a chance to upgrade their old Windows XP machines to the new version of XP for $39 and allow computer manufacturers install Widnows XPN on new computers without touch screens. Sell the new version of XP to computer manufacturers at a lower cost.
It shouldn’t take Microsoft years to modernize XP — it should take them less than a year. And in the interim, they should extend support to current XP users until the new version of XP is ready. Microsoft would please a lot of people and it would send a signal to everyone that Microsoft is, once again, listening to consumers.
If Microsoft intends to compete then it better start competing by innovating and giving people what they want or in five years they’ll be facing the same fate GM and Chrysler did whenn they teetered on the edge of bankruptcy.
Google is going make a version of the Chrome/Android operating system that is for desktops and laptops –and those will be available starting next summer. Those of you who have used Android phones or tablets know that Android is as easy to use — if not easier – than Windows. And Apple isn’t going away any time soon.
Microsoft needs to wake up and listen to the consumer. Instead of killing Windows XP they should revive it by modernizing it and adding features to it and giving millions of people exactly what they want. I would be the at the new updated version of Windows XP would be the biggest selling operating system ever. And Windows 8 would still be availalbe for tablets, phones and touch-screen PCs for those who want it.
Of course, I’m only daydreaming. This makes too much sense for it ever to be implemented. But…wouldn’t it be nice if for once, Microsoft listened to the consumer and gave them exactly what they want?
—————–
What do you think?
I TOTALLY agree with you! I don’t want to ditch my XP desktop and would buy an upgrade for sure.
I have just completed reading all the negative responses. You may also want to read the positive responses and I quote: http://askleo.com/embracing_the_most_important_attitude/?awt_l=Lz25Z&awt_m=Iwv4MM004JdfbL
and the final comment made by Leo Notenboom.
I agree 150% TC. From your mouth to God’s ear, and maybe then we’ll get the miracle needed to “screw on Microsoft’s heads” tight enough for them to make sensible decisions. NO WAY will I stand quietly if the inevitable happens……they go down the tube and then “request” a government bail out.
I’d like to clarify a bit. I have my XP desktop and a Win7 laptop. Win8.1. in some people’s view might be superior in some ways but the point TC makes…….the one-size-fits-all concept…….is an arrogant one, and throws many consumers under the bus. It all boils down to HOW you use your computer, and consumer CHOICE. The learning and relearning from OS-to-OS and browser-to- browser is bad enough when your income depends on productivity and output. Catering to the “touchscreen” crowd is ludicrous when it sacrifices the “just as important” convenience and user-friendly access for keyboard/mouse users. I do lots of work which doesn’t require an internet connection so I will continue to use my XP and all the expensive productivity XP software I have invested in, for as long as I can.
I agree with you…. it makes sense…. I’d love to have XP extended and upgraded…
You said exactly what all of us think Microsoft should do. Thanks!
If Microsoft was smart, your idea is exactly what they should do. But we know Microsoft isn’t smart, or they wouldn’t have tried to foist Windows 8 on everyone to start with. The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
You are so right on! I have from XP to Windows 7 and am still frustrated with how different it is from my great XP program. I bought the buy one get one key from you and am keeping them handy for when needed. I thought I needed it when right after I got the Windows 7 program I got a Scorpion virus due to me clicking on a Flash box thinking it was a real Flash update and not till the next day when I read it in your email did I realiaze I just made a big mistake. I tried using one of my keys but a wonderful neighbor helped me get rid of it so am saving them for another time. I am using Google Chrome now as IE gave me so much trouble. Thanks for all your wonderful and helpful tips.
Oh my gosh I agree I’m sorry but I don’t care for 7 on my main desk top and have XP on another slower one and would buy another desktop if I could get it with XP or upgraded. I do all my banking,pay all my bills and have a program Creat-a-card plus 3 I can only use on XP they don’t make it any longer. I hope enough people complain to Microsoft. Bring back XP in some form.
I don’t know what all the fuss is about. I was worried about getting Windows 8.1 after all the negativity. Purchased an HP Envy23 All In One Touch Screen, and I love it!
I think I said if you have a tablet, smart phone or Touchscreen PC — Windows 8 makes sense. it does not make sense for mouse and keyboard users.
The fuss is about PC sales falling to their lowest levels ever — corporations are not going to invest in all new touch-screen PCs just so they can run Windows 8.1. That’s why Microsoft has extended the time for manufacturers to install Windows 7 on new computers. And corporate customers and PC sales are two of Microsoft’s biggest cash cows – and that’s what the fuss is about.
Facts are facts – but again, if you have a touch screen then Windows 8 makes sense. A touch screen PC or laptop is like a big tablet with a keyboard…so Windows 8 would be fine. But touch screen PCs and laptops aren’t selling well — that tells me most people are comfortable with keyboard and mouse. If Microsoft would revive Windows XP and give people the choice they’d sell more copies of Windows. I never said Windows 8.1 was terrible for everything. I said it makes no sense for those who use a keyboard and a mouse.
Boeing makes many different kinds of airplanes, but they still make the 737 –its most successful aircraft ever — though they certainly make more money on the new models –767, 777, and 787. It’s all about give each customer what he or she wants. Microsoft has never really done that since Windows XP. All I’m saying is — maybe it’s time they did.
I think you have the best idea. Have you mentioned this to Microsoft? I am holding on to my XP until April and then I don’t know what I will do. I have been considering purchasing a new computer but I didn’t want to get one with the new operating system that Microsoft has “forced” upon us. I have a laptop which my son gave to me but it has the Vista operating system on it and I don’t care for that one either. If Microsoft considers your idea, then I will be a happy camper once again. I just purchased the keys again, knowing that I will need your help when I get a new PC. I have been with Cloudeight since your beginning and I really appreciate all the information you have shared with me in your newsletters. Thanks again……….Luana
I also wholeheartedly agree with Dianne’s comment. If it were not for Microsoft introducing their first operating system back in the 70’s many people today would still be without a computer. Personally I use a PC and laptop with Windows 8.1 and, like Dianne. and, no doubt, many other people, quite satisfactorily, yet I equally enjoy using my Apple I-Pad, particularly, when I am travelling. Today one has a choice. If you do not enjoy driving a GM. Ford or Chrysler, simply choose a different make as one can do with either Apple or Google. The same applies to one’s favorite search engine and browser.
You are exactly right as to what Microsoft should do, but they are much too arrogant to do it. They will not learn until it is too late. I wish Google would bring out those Android desktops in time for those of us holding onto XP until the last minute. They are missing a big market by waiting until summer to introduce them.
I AGREE WITH YOU 200%. MS NEEDS A NEW WINDOWS XP? THAT WOULD BE UPWARD COMPATIBLE WITH CURRENT XP USERS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR WISDOM. I HOPE MS LISTENS TO YOUR ADVICE. THANKS, JIM
agree
I agree
Hopefully this will change when Steve Ballmer leaves the building. We can only hope.
I think you have missed the point completely.
The problem is not Windows 8 or 8.1. They are magnificent operating systems – the best Microsoft have produced.
The problem is that Microsoft have done a poor job of marketing them, as they did with Vista (Google the Mojave experiment). It was, and is a good system.
Forget about the ’tiles’. They are an evolution to suit all forms of computer (and phone).
The crucial point is that the ‘Start’ button was in the same place and took you to the Start Screen (which just happens to be in a graphic tile format). It is now simple to find any programme or file by just typing its name on the Start screen.
I suspect you may also be one of those who has not found the alphabetic list of programmes in 8.1 – just try clicking the bottom left down arrow on the Start screen to get the apps, and then click the little negative sign in the bottom right of that page (on the bar) and you have an alphabetic listing. Marvellous! Your job is to get the Luddites of the couch and help them rather than joining the pack who are resistant to change.
PS You still do a good job in most instances!
Windows XP, unlike Windows 8, was not based on a previous operating system. Windows 8 is not a totally new operating system — Windows 8 is the third iteration of Windows Vista; Windows 8.1 is the fourth. So if it’s magnificent it’s magnificent because it’s 4th-generation Vista.
Additionally, Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 sales have been the worst ever for a new Windows operating system. So no matter how “marvelous” it is, it’s still a flop. Microsoft is not be responsive to its bread-and-butter customers — the non-techie and the corporate customer. There is nothing wrong with Windows 8/8.1 but the point is they turn-off a lot of customers. The Edsel may have been a “marvelous” car, but it didn’t sell. Luckily, Ford had other models to sell.
The one-size-fits-all approach hardly ever works. Making one operating system for Tablets, phones, PCs and Laptops was done for one reason — and it was not for the consumers’ benefit — it was done to be cost-effective for Microsoft.
Windows 8 is not the next great thing from Microsoft — it wasn’t built from the ground-up as XP was. It was layered on top of Windows 7, which was layered on top of Windows Vista – it is not a brand new operating system, as XP was.
Personally, I wouldn’t go back to Windows XP, but I still think it was innovative at the time and almost killed Apple (Microsoft had to bail Apple out). I have Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 both — but my Windows 8.1 laptop is not touchscreen. So I use Windows 7 almost exclusively for business. I don’t think Windows 8.1 is bad, I just don’t think it’s a very good operating system for those who prefer to use a mouse and keyboard — i.e. most older Windows users, and almost all corporate users.
One-size-fits-all may save money, but it sure doesn’t show much concern for users. I am not saying Microsoft should do away with Windows 8/8.1 — they should offer another OS for those who currently use and love XP. It would be a financial bonanza for Microsoft and its investors and wouldn’t take that long to develop.
My take is — put Windows 8 on tablets, smartphones, and touch-screen PCs and Laptops — and something else on devices without touch screens.
It’s just my opinion, you may still disagree. But I think the majority seem to agree — don’t you?
I’m sorry you missed the point of the article. A company must give consumers what they want — not what you might want or I might want, but what the majority want. Apple doesn’t make one-size-fits-all operating systems and giving the fact that Apple has introduced “new” technology, embraced by the masses, one would have to admit they’ve done a good job – they introduced iPod and a year later Microsoft introduced Zune and it flopped. Zune might have been a great music player — I don’t know — but it flopped so it doesn’t matter.
Apple introduced the iPhone – and two years later – Microsoft introduced the ill-fated Kin phone. Does anyone even remember it? It was a flop. I may have been technologically superior to the iPhone — but it doesn’t matter – it was a failure in the market place.
Apple introduced the iPad. Two years later Microsoft introduced the Surface tablet. Facts are Facts – iPad outsold Surface 10 to 1. Surface may well be the best tablet on Earth; but it doesn’t matter, it’s running a distant third behind Apple and Android (Google) tablets.
Defending Microsoft, is not a tenable position since Microsoft admits Windows 8 and 8.1 are major disappointments. So guess what? Windows 8.2 is going to be more like XP and Windows 7 – why? Because new management at Microsoft realizes that THE MAJORITY (I didn’t say no one) do not like Windows 8 / 8.1. Sales of Windows 8 are the worst ever for Microsoft –even worse than the much-maligned Vista. Windows 8 may well be the best, most technologically advanced operating system ever (it is hard for me to believe that since it’s built on the Vista platform and not a completely new OS) but what does it matter? It’s a failure – that’s a fact.
You assume the position that anyone who rejects something new is a dinosaur. I’m not a dinosaur — I know computers well. I use my Windows 7 laptop for business and most of the time for my personal computing. I don’t have a touch screen Windows 8 laptop, so the Start Screen and all the swiping and pinching mean nothing to me. I have a tablet computer and I’m really good at tapping, swiping, and pinching — but when it comes to serious computing, I like the point and click simplicity of a mouse. That’s my personal opinion. I don’t foist it upon others.
Boeing makes a lot of different kinds of Jets — and it still makes the 30+ year-old Boeing 737. They didn’t let it get outdated, they kept updating it so it can compete with the A-320 jet.
The only reason Microsoft didn’t keep updating and refining Windows XP wasn’t because it didn’t want “dinosaurs” buying it – it came out with new operating systems because they make huge profits by doing so. That’s been their model since Windows 3.1.
If anyone is a dinosaur it’s someone who thinks Microsoft can continue on with their out-of-date business model of charging consumers $100+ for a new operating system ever 2 years. Apple, just this year, decided they are not going to charge for new operating systems any long — and they’ve never charged their users $100 or even close for a new operating system. Last time i checked, Apple was worth more than Microsoft.
So who’s the dinosaur? The consumer who wants to use what he or she likes? Or the person that believes that Microsoft can compete by doing the same old things they’ve always done – squeezing 100 bucks or so from the consumer – or new fees from computer manufacturers every couple of years?
Microsoft cannot continue with business as usual — it’s not going to work anymore. PCs are only one of the ways people connect to the Internet these days — and if PC sales keep plummeting, you have to ask yourself why. Windows 8 may indeed be the technological wonder you say it is. But if people won’t buy it, it will just be another Zune, or Kin…right?
Microsoft needs to please a wide variety of people — and the one-size-fits-all, trying-to-please-everyone approach has never worked – and it won’t work for Microsoft either.
Coca-Cola might be the best tasting soda in the world (matter of opinion) but Coca-Cola offers dozens of other flavors. Why can’t Microsoft use bilateral or trilateral approach. What’s one with more than one version of Windows?
If Microsoft continues on its present path, it will fall further behind and 20 years from now — it will be the dinosaur of which you like to write.
LOL I think you should have proof read that before posting! You are in a very small percentage of people who think windows 8 is great for desktops! And I really do NOT believe its because the rest of the world are “Luddites” {sic}. I also believe windows 8 is great for notepads, phones, etc. NOT for any computer I’m trying to do business on! OMG please I would like to at least make enough to buy some plain white bread! But, just because I am such an old “Luddite I’ve decided to invest in the new Mac Pro! WOOT why? Because its so much better than Microsoft’s windows 8—any version! And because being an old Luddite I can afford it! And LOL I WANT it! Oh yes, I don’t care where anything is located on Windows 8.1 now…Microsoft has some real competition going on! HMM I don’t think Microsoft can even begin to compete to be quite honest!
PS any grammatical errors located in my topic is just plain okay by me! I’m a happy Luddite.
Hehe I do hope someone notices my sentence frag!
Get with it Lizza!
I am not surprised you have gone to a Mac (which I also use). Unfortunately, much of the software I need to use (I work with those with impairments and accessibility issues) is not provided in the Apple systems.
I think you should reread my article. I did not say all were Luddites – what I said was that Infoave should be encouraging the Luddites who find change difficult.
I think what both you and Infoave have ignored, is that you don’t have to use the tiles, as you can very simply set up 8.1 to open at what appears as a normal desktop, irrespective of touch, tiles or machine. However, by not using the tiles you are missing out on some great learning experiences e.g look at the Store tile.
I was quite exhausted trying to follow the circuitous response by Infoave to justify their stance. As I said, Microsoft has not been good at marketing their ‘new’ systems.
Apart from working with those with impairments and writing a national computer column for nearly two decades, I work with teaching seniors computer skills and confidence. Give me 15-20 minutes with one of these people and they then love Windows 8/8.1. It is all about marketing.
I think I’m going to have to write another article — it really appears to me that I didn’t write this very clearly. So let me make this clear: I DO NOT THINK WINDOWS 8 or 8.1 IS A TERRIBLE OPERATING SYSTEM. I THINK THAT MICROSOFT MADE A MISTAKE BY TRYING TO MAKE A ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL OPERATING SYSTEM.
Let me make something else clear:
I AM NOT OPPOSED TO CHANGE. I WAS WINDOWS XP’S BIGGEST FAN AND IN FACT USED XP’S BETA VERSION ALL OF THE TIME — INSTEAD OF WINDOWS 98 OR XP. I USED VISTA AS SOON AS IT CAME OUT (it as a terribly hungry system) AND I USED WINDOWS 7 AS SOON AS IT CAME OUT.
I HAVE A WINDOWS 8.1 COMPUTER. I USE IT. BUT YOU’RE WRONG ABOUT THE START BUTTON ON 8.1. IT DOES NO OPEN A WINDOWS START MENU. IT OPENS THE START SCREEN AND WITH SOME FINAGLING IT OPENS A START MENU ORGANIZED WITH DESKTOP APPS FIRST — WITH VERY SMALL TILES.
Is it clear now that I’m not opposed to change? I don’t think Windows 8.1 or Windows 8 is a useless operating system. I’m not advising anyone — repeat — I AM NOT ADVISING ANYONE — to stick with Windows XP.
This article was basically a muse of what Microsoft should do – and that’s an OPINION — not a fact. But if you want facts here it goes:
Windows 8 and 8.1 is the poorest selling new Windows version ever.
Windows 8 and 8.1 are the first Microsoft operating systems to be released in the age of Tablets and Smartphones. Sure when Windows 7 was released in 2009, there were smartphones and tablets but they were not anywhere near as ubiquitous as they are now.
Microsoft can no longer play the role of the computer god who rules the computer world it created. That world has changed. Apples does not use the same operating system on MacBooks and Macs as it does on its iPads and iPhones. Google does not use the same operating system on phones, tablets and Chromebooks. And it will release a special version of Android for laptops and desktops this coming summer.
I never said that Windows should go backwards. But the idea that everyone who loves XP are backwards, conservative, anti-progressives and against all things new, is but a foolish generalization.
Let me make this clear: MICROSOFT SHOULD GIVE THE CONSUMER WHAT THE CONSUMER WANTS. SALES OF WINDOWS 8.1 AND WINDOWS 8 HAVE BEEN DISMAL — THE WORST EVER FOR A NEW WINDOWS OPERATING SYSTEM. THAT SHOULD TELL MICROSOFT SOMETHING. AND APPARENTLY IT HAS. AND APPARENTLY MICROSOFT DOES NOT AGREE WITH YOU — WINDOWS 8.2 WILL HAVE A REAL START BUTTON WITH A REAL START MENU AND WILL MAKE IT EASY FOR PEOPLE TO CHOOSE BETWEEN THE WINDOWS 8 FOR TOUCH SCREENS AND THE WINDOWS FOR NON-TOUCHSCREEN LAPTOPS AND DESKTOPS.
I AM NOT AGAINST CHANGE. I AM NOT PARTICULARLY ANTI-MICROSOFT. I AM ANTI-ARROGANCE. I AM ANTI-STUPID. IF SOMETHING ISN’T SELLING WELL AND YOUR COMPANY’S NAME IS NOT MICROSOFT, YOU QUICKLY REALIZE YOUR MISTAKE AND GET SOMETHING ELSE TO MARKET OR YOUR COMPANY GOES BANKRUPT. BECAUSE MICROSOFT HAS HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ITS COFFERS IT CAN RELEASE WHATEVER IT WANTS PEOPLE TO HAVE WITHOUT REGARD TO WHAT THEY WANT, AND CAN SPEND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ADVERTISING IT TRYING TO MAKE PEOPLE WANT IT. IN THE CASE OF WINDOWS 8/8.1 ALL THE KING’S HORSES AND ALL THE KING’S MEN, CAN’T PUT HUMPTY DUMPTY BACK TOGETHER AGAIN.
I AM NOT OPPOSED TO CHANGE. I DO NOT THINK WINDOWS 8 OR WINDOWS 8.1 IS A TERRIBLE OPERATING SYSTEM. I DON’T THINK PEOPLE SHOULD KEEP USING WINDOWS XP AFTER APRIL 2014. BUT I DON’T THINK PEOPLE WHO LIKE XP AND WOULD LIKE MICROSOFT TO UPDATE IT TO A SECURE, MORE MODERN VERSION ARE BACKWOODS OAFS OPPOSED TO CHANGE.
It would be nice, it really would, if people who disagreed with this view would cite facts — show me where Windows 8.1 or Windows 8 has taken the computer world by storm and laptop and desktop sales are soaring. These would indicate that Microsoft has released an operating system that appeals to the masses — that is embraced by its customer based. But there are no such facts and calling people who don’t like Windows 8 or its incarnations “Luddites”, is just plain wrong.
People who like Windows XP and would like a chance to buy an updated, modern, secure version of Windows are not “Luddites”, or oafs, or fools or backward hillbillies. They are people. They are consumer. What is foolish and backwards and arrogant is Microsoft turning its back on the masses — those who help make it one of the world’s most prosperous corporations.
That’s my opinion but it’s based on fact. Windows 8 / 8.1 have been a sales disaster for Microsoft. And no one can disagree with that — can they?
So if people aren’t buying something, doesn’t that say something? Or do you just think everyone who doesn’t like Windows 8/8.1 are just a bunch of dumb Luddites walking around in a hazy yesterday, totally incompetent to own or operate a computer?
Seriously?
I never said Windows 8 or 8.1 was a horrible operating system. But other than it’s new interface, it’s just Vista cum Windows 7 cum Windows 8. It was not built from the ground up like a previous Windows operating system. Can you guess which one was?
Windows XP.
Thay puts your view more clearly (and succintly).
Howver, if we think Apple are doing a better job give your self a couple of days to trawl through the negative comments on their new Maverick OS at http://goo.gl/5YtuKI.
Had Windows XP and loved it. Now have Windows 7 which doesn’t compare with XP and would gladly return to an updated XP If I had the chance. XP did what I wanted and served its purpose for me for years.
Well They won’t listen and we will see what happens. I worked for Kodak in Rochester and you see what happened to them. I have two desk tops XP and windows 7 which I don’t care for. XP is great,easy to use and I love outlook express. We can’t all like the same but give us a choice.
TC you are rite on but the big companies dont listen to us small people they should have you there and I know you would put them back in the game.
The only word I can think of is “AMEN” to revamp XP.
I think you are right, I agree totally. I hate to give up XP!!!!!
Your idea makes way to much sense and not enough MONEY for Microsoft. After all, that’s what Microsoft is all about….making MONEY and the way they do that is to keep coming up with ideas…albeit DUMB ideas. With every new Windows version they make millions because people are forced to “upgrade” whether they want to or not. Then they “allow” vulnerabilities to go unchecked which then let’s them tout the need for the “new and improved version of Windows”….even though the newest is usually the worst.
I’ll keep using my XP and just do all I can to stay safe. Maybe new blood will flow someday at Microsoft and saner heads will rule. I doubt it, since it’s all about the MONEY…but one can hope.
Yes, you are right. It is all about money; after all, they happen to run a business. So do Apple, Google, Samsung, etc.
Totally agree and perhaps Microsoft needs to remember Word Perfect. Many still prefer it to theirs. But then Microsoft hasn’t listened to us for years, unfortunately.
TC, I hope you are sending your email/suggestion on to Microsoft! Many years ago, my computer with XP died and I stupidly got a new one with Vista on it. I have always missed XP and have no desire to upgrade to 7, 8 or 8.1. Even though I am not thrilled with Vista, I’m used to it. I wish Microsoft would listen to people with ideas like yours…
I don’t understand why someone wants to use a touch screen and put fingerprints all over your screen and lean forward all the time. I have a nice big monitor and I just lean back in my chair with my wireless mouse and surf the web 🙂
I totally agree with Jane’s comments and a lot of others also. XP is just “GREAT!!!” as Tony the tiger would say. I am going to buy a lap top computer soon, but will wait till the folks at Microsoft get “WITH IT”. Just me two cents worth. Arnie in Nova Scotia.
IMHO XP was the finest OS that Microsoft ever produced. I used it for years and would still do but
an earthquake in Feb 2011 knocked it off my desk and ruined it completely. Had to change to
Windows 7 but would much prefer XP. Hope MS take your advice and produce a Windows XP+.
Love your Newsletters. Thanks, Ray
All I want in 2014 is a new version of Windows XP, by whatever name it’s called. If only!
Barb.
I so totally agree, I would be the first inline for my new version of Windows XP!
I agree totally. Microsoft produced operating systems after XP with far too many problems. But dont expect too much, after all, I think the community has come up with all the fixes NOT Microsoft. They couldnt care less about it. But once they collect all these fixes, they then come out with yet another OS, promising better things. Then as usual, they expect the community to find all the answers and fixes for it. Anyone will tell you the people at Microsoft are not helpful. Bill Gates managed to become a billionaire though. That is amazing. Unfortunately Apple Mac has fewer software available at almost double the pricetoo, so there was never much competition
Being concerned that Win8 was eventually going to be required, I actually ordered a $1600 HP pc last February. There it sits, collecting dust. I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve booted it up. I have a Cloudeight key for the email, etc. But haven’t used it yet. Don’t want TC to know just how much I don’t know how to use the thing.
I am no techie by any stretch. But, I have helped several folks with their XP issues. I pretty much know how to fix things. But, I just don’t get Windows 8.
I agree Microsoft needs to rethink their strategies, and give the people what they want. I, for one, would be willing to pay for a revamped Windows XP.
Keep XP !
I will not give up XP. What is the worst that will happen?
Your XP will become compromised you may not be able to use it at all. it is very likely it will be turned into a zombie or spam bot and used by criminals to send spam and viruses, Trojans, Worms and rogues from your machine without you knowing it. No matter what anti-virus or anti-malware you use, the operating system itself will become insecure and it will be exploited – you can bet on it. It happened with Windows 98 — we witnessed it as worms and other malware spewed from compromised Windows 98 machines. It’s not only your computer but other computers as well.
TC, a very thoughtful article about MS and XP. It is an established fact that Microsoft has long since lost touch with it’s customer base, both retail and enterprise. The numbers are of record and the numbers don’t lie. No matter how much anyone wants MS to revamp and re-release XP we all know that won’t happen. MS is dedicated (nice way to put it) to the mission of forcing Windows 8 down our collective throats. There’s nothing new in this concept. They’ve been doing it for years and who do we blame for that? Why us, of course. Retail buyers and enterprise purchasing departments have followed blindly with their dollars and enabled MS to do as they please in what I feel is a very unaccountable manner of doing business. Why should they be held accountable. After all, they’re making plenty of money so what’s the problem. Wait, there is an awakening here in our midst. Windows 8 is doing more poorly than Vista you say? Ahhh, the wallet has finally spoken. However, we can say that’s a good start but unless the monetary pressure is maintained MS will eventually win. That, to me, is sad to say the least but I believe it to be true. Windows XP was a wonderful OS in it’s day. However, it’s day is gone no matter how many lament that happening. While Windows 8 has some good features, it is not the vehicle of choice that the majority wish to see. Like I said, the numbers don’t lie. If we stay with MS the version that is gaining by leaps and bounds in the retail and corporate sectors is Windows 7 Professional. The good news is that its a relatively easy transition from XP to Win7 for users, it enhances productivity, and requires an absolute minimum of training time in which to develop the proverbial comfort zone. As of now, it will be supported until January, 2020. It has a long life span ahead of it. My guess is that they will extend that time frame due to the large user base that will develop for that OS but that, of course, is only my personal speculation at this point. The alternatives, as you point out, are Mac, Linux, and Android. I could extrapolate on Mac and Linux. What I know about Android is that, to my knowledge, there is no platform available that will accept a copy of Android as it will Linux. Most existing hardware will lend itself to some distribution of Linux in it’s present configuration. However, Android is another matter. Where do you get the media for it? What are the minimum system requirements? Lots of questions to be answered about Android and, in the end, I’m not convinced that the rank-and-file user will be happy with it. Only time will tell. Since you are, I suspect, an Android enthusiast maybe you could expound on this a bit more in future musings. Thanks so much for all that you and Darcy do for all of us. It is truly appreciated. — Lee
I agree with you that Microsoft should regenerate Windows XP. We will support you in any efforts you may choose to take to ensure this happens. I am dreading losing my Windows XP.
This is the most sad letter I have read in some time. There are so many of you still living in the age of the dinosaurs. I’ve been working with computers since the late 50’s and I can assure you, they are developing in a cycle and are a planned absolution. Multi-task computers were available in the early 60’s, hi speed hard drives ran as much as 2000 times as fast as some of ones’ we have today, users had dumb terminals with a key board and monitor connected via telephone line to a large scale main frame computer. Those of you using the “Cloud” or “Skydrive” to store and operate your PC have just gone back to the technology of the 60’s. Just be satisfied you’re not paying the price of a $100,000 hard drive you can replace today with a $8 flash drive.
Get rid of your tin cans and string and enjoy the new(old?) technology. There are few of you using more than 2% of the capabilities of your PC, any new OS just have new buttons to use them.
My desktop experience began with a Tandy and progressed through MS-DOS, 3.1, 95, 98, XP, Vista, 7 to Windows 8.1 and Ubuntu.
Thank you Grandpa_Bev for your comment. Agree entirely. I am 80 years old. I write a national magazine computer column. I work with seniors and those with accessibility problems. Give me 10-20 minutes with an older person that is having Windows 8/8.1 ‘problems’ and I can guarantee to have them both comfortable and competent. It does not matter whether they have a tablet, laptop or desktop. You do not need to use the ’tile’ screen in 8/8.1, (but you are really missing out on having both fun and learning time with the many free apps). Come on you luddites – get with it instead of having such a miserable time with your resistance to change!
I agree with you 100%. I had to get a new computer but had Windows 7 installed instead of 8, as I heard so many negative words re 8. But I still would return to XP if it was brought back. All these replies should be sent to the head honcho at Microsoft. Maybe it would smarten them up to what their customers really want.
I agree pretty much of what has been said here. Last month my beloved Vista finally gave up and I was so upset! I had heard all the bad stuff about Windows 8 But no real choice left as to what to buy. So bought the Windows 8 and it was worse than I heard, I cried and was so frustrated! I never saw such a mess in a way a computer was put together. My husband is retired from Boeing and had been using work computers for a long time so he always was the one to put together our new computers over the years. So this time after he got it going, it was my turn to do my part.
In the weeks that followed his computer went belly up. So now he had to buy Windows 8. A few weeks later his new computer got a problem that could not be fixed so he returned it. Talk about being upset at Windows 8 and my husband now getting another Windows 8 or 8.1. He is getting a more expensive one and similar to the one I bought. So now we will live with being nervous with this program 🙁 What has helped is Cloudeight, Windows 8 for Dummies book and us getting use to what IS right now. Still dislike it though! For a laugh here we live less than 45 minutes from Microsoft, anyone have any tomato’s? Oh and after mine is all put together the way I want I will use one of my Computer Care Keys to have it checked out by Cloudeight!
Boy. Windows 8. I’m virtually computer illiterate ~ lived in a 3rd world country during ’80-’87 and often went without power (but it was in hot weather country, I’d die if I had temps Darcy & TC were experiencing..brrrr!) Anyway I came very late to the computer party. I believed Windows 8 would solve my idiot problems when I replaced my pc last year.
What a joke. The good news is that hearing others crabb about W8 is good for my ego, my sense of intelligence.
While I have already upgraded… Windows 7 on my laptop and Windows 8.1 on my desktop, I rarely use the ‘Metro’ screen on the desktop and have to agree that this whole trip is unnecessary. I would say that Microsoft has their proverbial ‘head up their ass’. Why can’t they stick with a desktop version that works and concentrate on the mobile versions without alienating their existing customer base? Please, can’t someone talk some sense to these people? And don’t tell me it’s all about the money or they would have back-tracked when they found out it wasn’t selling. Somebody’s ego is getting bruised!
I love my Windows 7. I think they ought to upgrade it and use it rather than xp. And, I hate 8. My husband has a Windows 8 computer, and neither of us can easily use it. So frustrating to have Windows at home and the office and when you need another computer, you’re stuck with 8!!
I started with an IBM computer that had the OS on a 5.25 floppy and through the years I have graduated to Windows 8.1. It is all right, especially with Classic Shell installed to give me what I want – the start button and the menu. Tiles and apps don’t cut it for me. I am writing this on a 5 or 6 year old Lenovo core duo that came with Vista and I have installed a 320GB hard drive and put Ubuntu 13.10 on it. I had given up on IE 10 so firefox is my browser of choice, and except for the fact that i can’t get Skype to work properly on Ubuntu i would not hesitate to use Ubuntu on all my future computers. I have 3 XP’s 1 Vista 3 7’s and 2 8.1 computers along with 3 Ubuntu computers now as I buy and sell and refurbish old computers as a hobby. But no one wants the XP’s so I just wish I could convince people to try Ubuntu.
I completely agree with the author though. An updated XP would be good
I agree with you. I love my desktop and maybe XP was old but a very easy one to use. I do not stand in mile long lines just to get the latest cell, Ipods or tablets just to make sure I have the latest on the market. Give us a choice.
I can almost guarantee that Microsoft will follow your recommendations, TC! I just purchased a new desktop with Windows 8.1. So, I’m pretty sure very soon they will announce that XP users will be able to hold on to that wonderful program. I wonder what they would charge me to DOWN-grade. Although to me it would be an UPgrade.
Wishful thinking on your part!
I think you have hit a nerve with the people the ones that loves XP and all the trimmings it came with and until they bring it all back it is but a scrap of metal on a dung hill. I have windows 7 but still yearn for XP I got so used to it and yes an upgraded one would be in order and if they do not do it they will lose half the market, now that might wake them up ,.
I have just completed reading all the negative responses. You may also want to read the positive responses and I quote: http://askleo.com/embracing_the_most_important_attitude/?awt_l=Lz25Z&awt_m=Iwv4MM004JdfbL
and the final comment made by Leo Notenboom.
I totally agree with you they need to bring back XP. I have one computer with XP and the other with Windows 7, I prefer the XP so user friendly. Microsoft needs to listen to the people who buy their products, I am 70 years old and really don’t want to loose what I already know how to run.
A resounding YES! to your article. You’d think Microsoft would finally listen to the average consumer. I really like the XP. I do not like Vista, Win 7 nor win 8 or whatever. When will they finally ‘get it?’